Where is Evanston Going?

Submitted by psanche on Sat, 11/01/2008 - 03:57

Recently several posts have discussed the future of Evanston, what the city needs and doesn't need. Does our city government itself know where it is going? Here is the city's mission statement, which you can find on the city's web page under "strategic plan':

"The City of Evanston is committed to promoting the highest quality of life for all residents by providing fiscally sound, responsive municipal services and delivering those services equitably, professionally with the highest degree of integrity."

How can anyone disagree with this statement? We can all agree with this vision because it is really saying nothing other than we'll try to do our best. Evanston's mission statement is so general that it does not, in any meaningful way, chart out a distinctive path for our city. The recent struggles over the downtown plan and the skyscraper make it clear that two diametrically opposed visions are being promoted for this city. It is also clear to many of us that the pro-high-rise, develop-everything-now vision is the minority vision. Now that an election is approaching, we are at a very important juncture that will allow us to ensure that the responsible development vision -- expressed by many of us, by CSNA, and by the Evanston Coalition for Responsible Development -- is adopted by the city as soon as possible and articulated clearly in its mission statement. The first step is to ensure that in the elections scheduled for next year we elect a mayor and aldermen who clearly articulate, are committed to and openly embrace a responsible development vision. Once elected, we should encourage the new mayor and council to amend the city's mission statement to reflect a responsible development perspective. If we do this we can prevent future meaningless battles that waste the city's resources and resident time and energy.

Peter Sanchez
2228 Pioneer Road

Forums:

johnzbesko

Wed, 11/12/2008 - 23:21

With as many as four new “parks” in Evanston - Central Street, Main & Chicago Avenue, Kendall College,and a piece of the Research Park- the economy has done what the Evanston City Council failed to do, prevent an overbuilding of condo buildings.

My sense is that the current Council is motivated by a desire to increase City revenue through increased building permit fees and increased property values that eventually result in higher property taxes. The fact that Evanston is well served by public transportation is used as a “green” argument for increased population density, e.g. by reducing automobile commuting. The notion that most condo owners do not have children in the public school system further justified condo development as a relative property tax gain for the school districts. So when developers came to the Council pushing their plans, the most vocal opposition came not from the Council, but by (mostly) home owning residents. The Council responded by arranging meetings between developers and neighbors, and they created a process to write zoning plans, such as for downtown or Central Street. These plans seem to be compromises between developers and citizens.

The City Council is not very pro-active. Complaints about too much condo development are met with “but that’s what the developers want to build.” That was true. Part of the nature of the capitalist system is that once someone makes money with some activity, it attracts many copycats until nobody can make a profit. The latest downtown zoning plan was recently presented to the Council and much of the discussion centered on the amount of parking needed for condo buildings. No discussion took place about incentives for building office/commercial space. Workers can and do use the plentiful public transit options to commute to Evanston. They leave their cars at home. Condo owners, who may commute away from Evanston, need to park their cars at home, ie. Evanston. Both groups may be driving less, but workers require less parking than residents and are easier to motivate to not bring cars to downtown.

Having a relatively greater daytime population would also bring benefits. More demand for lunch, as opposed to dinner. More potential demand for local businesses, as workers schedule an appointment or shop close to work rather than home.

Making Evanston a better place to work seems to be ignored. No major corporate headquarters have replaced the old Washington National office building. Northwestern University spins off new technology businesses (such as in nanotechnology) that seem to settle and grow in Skokie, rather than Evanston. Instead, Evanston's light manufacturing zoned areas are getting developed as new retail (near James Park) or more residential (where Hines Lumber used to be.)

My vision includes a “wish list” based on what the people of Evanston would like to see. Would the people of Evanston support a large live performance theater? How about a bowling alley, like the one in the Glen? Soccer has grown to be a very popular sport in Evanston. Could an indoor soccer facility, such as the Windy City Fieldhouse, prosper in Evanston?

Finally, small business seems forgotten in the glare of big multistory condo buildings. When plans for the tower were debated before the Council, many therapists testified to the lack of replacement office space. Small business proprietorships are important contributors to economic development. Dental/medical offices, 1-2 person law offices, financial planning, design consultants and other professional offices provide employment within a walk or bicycle ride commute. Light industry, such as lawn care or auto repair shops, provide local jobs for those not professionally trained. I am committed to Evanston's economic diversity and will work to prevent Evanston from becoming just a bedroom community.

John Zbesko
Candidate for 7th Ward Alderman

jeffpsmith

Sun, 11/16/2008 - 14:45

Thank you for your post, John. I encourage all candidates for alderperson or mayor to feel free to express their thoughts here, whether formal statements or informal participation in ongoing conversations.

Sharon Strobeck...

Thu, 12/18/2008 - 12:29

Sharon Strobeck Eckersall
Evanston Township Assessor
847-989-7705

As a life-time Evanstonian, I would like to express my qualifications for office of Evanston Township Assessor.

-Township Assessor 10 years
-Licensed Residential Appraiser/Illinois 14 years
-Real Estate Broker 25 years
-Certified Illinois Assessing Officer - 12 years
-Licensed Wisconsin Real Estate Agent
-BA Degree in Management/with honors/Mundelien College

Along with the above, I have taken approximately 40 courses through the Illinois Property Assessment Institute, Bloomington, Illinois, which are directly related to the Assessor's position.

The importance of this position is to educate the taxpayers on the various exemptions which are available to them and make sure that each and every taxpayer has the proper exemptions on their tax bills to help defray the continued increase we experience in Cook County.

As I mentioned I have lived in Evanston my entire life.
My grandfather was a mailman in the early 1900's and my mother and my son also graduated from Evanston High School.

I have deep roots in the community and continue to be on various Boards including my alumni Board at Mundelien College.

I hope to continue helping taxpayers. My office is very accessible at Main and Dodge and also very visible with a large sign posted.

Please feel free to drop in.